
German soldiers began the invasion 70 years ago

German troops made quick
advances in the Baltics and Ukraine
Germany's invasion of the USSR
was the largest excess of violence in modern history. Millions of
soldiers and civilians lost their lives, but it took decades for
both countries to come to terms with the past.
June 22 marks the 70th anniversary of the start of Germany's
offensive against the Soviet Union in World War II. To examine the
historical significance of this, Deutsche Welle spoke with Wolfram
Wette, a professor of history at the University of
Freiburg.
DW: What was the objective of the military offensive
"Operation Barbarossa," which began on June 22, 1941?
Wolfram Wette: The objective was to conquer the Soviet Union, to
decimate its population, to exploit the land - in order to colonize
the country with Germans in the distant future. So it was a war for
the capture of "Lebensraum," or "living space," in the East. They
wanted to colonize the Soviet Union up to the Ural Mountains in
order to create an self-sufficient, strongly protected Greater
German Reich from the Atlantic to the Urals.
Was it then a racially motivated campaign of
annihilation?
This aspect belongs directly to that aim, and is inseparably
linked with the war in Russia. Hitler was convinced that Russia was
dominated by "Jewish-Bolsheviks." And of course you could conquer
this area and be able to use it for German purposes once you
eliminate this establishment. The plans were made based on a speech
by Hitler on March 30, 1941, given before 250 generals commanding
the Eastern Army.
There he said very clearly that it was a war of annihilation in
which no prisoners would be taken. Hitler said the Red Army soldier
should not be considered a comrade protected by the rules of war.
In practice, this meant that of the 5.7 million captured Red Army
soldiers, more than 3 million perished in German camps.
Was there any opposition at the time? Did the military elites
express moral reservations?
There was isolated opposition. And many apologists for the armed
forces say this was where the army showed its good heart in
contrast with the criminal demands of Hitler. But if you look more
closely, the partial opposition from the chief of the army high
command, Field Marshal Keitel, was simply swept aside. He played no
roll in the planning and execution of the Russian war.
The generals did not decide to protest against Hitler's ideas of
annihilation, and thus made themselves into collaborators in his
racial ideology that went along with the military war. They are
also fully responsible for what occurred on the orders of Hitler's
speech on March 30.
The German military initially experienced rapid success - in
the Baltic states and in Belarus....
They had in mind the Blitzkrieg against France that came to such
a quick end in 1940. And they imagined that they could conduct a
comparable Blitzkrieg in the Soviet Union with fast-moving tanks.
The dominant concept was that while Russia was enormous, it was a
brittle colossus that would quickly be shattered by the onslaught
of the German army. In fact, the first weeks of the war advanced
quite rapidly.
The Baltic countries were overrun in a few weeks. The German
troops were already in Belarus and Ukraine. But in winter, from
December of 1941 onward, there was no passing beyond Moscow. This
so-called turning point before Moscow made it clear to everyone in
Germany that they had gotten themselves into a campaign whose
outcome was uncertain. Perhaps some of them finally remembered what
befell Napoleon, when, even with his great army, he failed and
returned to the West with just a few soldiers.
The whole Russian war cost millions of lives. Three million
Wehrmacht soldiers marched across Russian borders on June 22, 1941.
And approximately the same number, three million, never returned
from Russia. But Russia itself suffered some 10 times the
casualties, around 27 million lives. Of those, it's estimated that
10 million were in the Red Army - fighting soldiers. More than
three million were, as I said, Russian prisoners of war in German
camps.
And then three million Russian Jews were systematically murdered
by the Germans. Remaining are the six to 10 million Soviet
civilians about whose fate still far too little is known, for lack
of historical research in Germany and Russia. Some six million
Soviet civilians fell victim in one way or another to the German
annihilation policy - be it through the systematic hunger policy
that was carried out by the German side, or through the burning of
villages and cities and other atrocities. We have at least twice as
many civilian deaths in the Soviet Union [as in Germany], which is
a fact Germany must remember much more than it does. Otherwise
there arises a complete imbalance in how we judge the numbers of
the dead.
Even decades after the Second World War, Germany has tried
very little to talk about these terrible deeds, to push them aside.
Why has the invasion of the Soviet Union been such a non-issue for
so long?
After 1945, the army elite very systematically spread the legend
of the clean and professional Wehrmacht. And in doing that, they
placed all of the responsibility for the crimes that took place in
the East on the SS. They said they did the dirty work. And we
conducted a war in accordance with human rights.
This legend of the clean Wehrmacht was very gladly accepted by
all who served. Even the small soldier said, "I fought for a clean
military, not for a band of criminals." So there was a collective
exoneration, a collective excuse that carried on for decades. And
it took a long time until the historical research was able to
create cracks in the body of the legend.
Could one then say today that the war against the Soviet
Union has a place in the collective consciousness of the
Germans?
Well I would give the hopeful answer that the German war against
the Soviet Union has since found a fixed place in the
historical-political consciousness of Germans. I think that the
field of historical studies in Germany has achieved a lot here. And
also the media, which have transmitted the story to the people in
an appropriate way.
All together there has been a learning process in the
consciousness of the German population that astonishes people in
other countries, and that's spoken of very positively. We have
managed a cultural achievement that we by no means have to
hide.
And how does that look on the Russian side?
Naturally very different. The Soviet Union was a victor in the
Second World War. Stalin was exalted by the people at the time of
capitulation as someone who mobilized the country, who held
together the huge Red Army, who brought weapons production up to
speed - which in the end resulted in victory. So everything
concentrated positively on the personality of Stalin - with the
consequence that all of the crimes of Stalin were repressed.
The victory of the Soviet Union at that time was something that
welded the country together, that stabilized it and that made it
possible for it to become a world power for a half century. In this
respect, the German aggression against the USSR turned out to be a
stabilizing factor for communist domination - even though it was
intended to end Bolshevik rule.
It's quite astounding to see that Russian people today hardly
feel any hate toward Germans. No one looks at the other as an
enemy. The Germans could not hope for a better situation. A large
learning process has taken place in the last few decades in Russia
as well.

Wolfram Wette is an
author and professor of history
Interview: Cornelia Rabitz / acb
Editor: Michael Lawton